Mlc 2006 Seafarers Employment Agreement

Mlc 2006 Seafarers Employment Agreement

MLC requires that, if the employment contract is not in English, the translation of certain sections should be in English. Standard A2.1, paragraph 1, point c), provides that the shipowner and the sailor concerned each have an original signed from the sailor`s employment contract, without specifying that the original should be on board. Since paragraphs 1 and 2 of the A2.1 standard must provide only one copy of the agreement and all collective agreements applicable on board, it is not necessary for the originals to be kept on board. The owner (MLC) according to MLC must be registered (by name and address) on the employment contract (A2.1.4b). While the “crew manager” as an employer has entered into the employment contract with this sailor and may be responsible for the performance of this contract, including the payment of wages, the shipowner continues to assume overall responsibility towards the sailor. The “crew chief” as an employer may sign the employment contract as a representative of the shipowner (operator) (A2.1.1a). The Seafarers` Standard Employment Contract (SEA) has been updated as part of this notice and made available on the following link: the SEA Model Yes, if the “owner” is the employer of seafarers; if the agreement establishes a relationship with the (MLC) “owner” as the “owner`s” agent and the employment contract includes the name and address of the shipowner (MLC). It is enough that the employment contract is concluded in English. MLC requires that the sailor be given the opportunity to be advised on the employment contract and to declare duties and responsibilities under the agreement before the sailor signs it. DMLC II should reflect this provision. In addition, during an on-board interview with sailors, our inspectors will ask the sailor if there was an opportunity to do so. In accordance with the 2006 Maritime Labour Convention (`MLC`): Yes, that is acceptable.

Under MLC, it is not necessary for an agreement signed with a local union to be approved by ITF. The CBA`s terms and conditions must, however, include the minimum requirements of A2.1.4, 2.1.5 and 2.1.6. It may be good to have the employment contract/CBA in the language of the sailors. However, it is not necessary. The administration may accept the crew chief as an “employer” in the employment contract, but the crew chief is not the MLC shipowner (Article II j) who has agreed to assume the obligations and responsibilities imposed on shipowners in accordance with the agreement. (Let the crew chief perform certain duties or responsibilities on behalf of the shipowner (MLC) If the sailor is employed directly by the shipowner, the sea must be located between the sailor and the shipowner and signed by both the sailor, the shipowner or an authorized signatory of the shipowner. Any signatory authorized by the shipowner to sign SEAS for sailors working on the vessel should be mentioned in the second part of the declaration on compliance with the rules relating to maritime work for the vessel. If a sailor is not employed directly by the shipowner, but by a third party (for example. B of a crew agency), the employer must be a contracting party to the SUP.

In such cases, the shipowner (or an authorized signatory to the shipowner) must also sign the agreement to ensure that the shipowner will fulfill all of the employer`s obligations to the sea under Parts 1 and 2 of Schedule 1 of this MGN if the employer does not comply with these obligations. The “marin contract model for a occupied sailor” (see Schedule 2 of the MGN) accordingly provides for the employer, the shipowner and the sailor to sign the Seafar.